Received: from rmx10.globecomm.net (rmx10.iname.net [165.251.12.105]) by discover-net.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA04353 for ; Sat, 1 May 1999 11:30:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from smv10.globecomm.net by rmx10.globecomm.net (8.9.1a/8.8.0) with SMTP id MAA27534 ; Sat, 1 May 1999 12:38:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from anon.lcs.mit.edu (anon.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.254]) by smv10.globecomm.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1SMVSNAP) with SMTP id MAA09731 for ; Sat, 1 May 1999 12:38:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: 1 May 1999 16:38:06 -0000 Message-ID: <19990501163806.18594.qmail@nym.alias.net> From: Ramsey To: cheesy21@email.com Subject: Here to Help X-UIDL: f7dea898b2d051ca30b81ebfbe4e9e03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi, I haven't heard from you since your mail concerning Leeza. Must have been a real winner. I also never got a response to my mail to you. May I suggest you archive, as my mail server is very undependable at times. Then, I guess you are waiting for me to answer all those questions. I do wish you would still respond to my last mail. Now, about your friend's dilemma with A&E.... I would advise her to secure a good attorney who has knowledge of entertainment law; contracts, releases, etc. She DOES have recourse in this matter for two reasons: releases and the fact that her child is a minor. Unfortunately, look at all the pictures and press revolving around JonBenet. Let me tell you that, after her death, there have been little or no permission acquired to use her image or the like. The media has shown total disrespect to her family by plastering her image all over the place, furthermore, captioning her pictures with vicious lies about her family. Why don't you tell your friend to write to me here. I'd be glad to be a supportive friend. She might be disappointed that I will not talk pageants with her, but I would be glad to help her otherwise. A&E did us a great favor once. I'm disappointed, especially at Bill Kurtis of all people. Now, about the questions.... I receive a host of questions each day. Some people are very violent with their approach, especially when I don't answer them. You see, the grand jury has still not indicted anyone. The case remains under investigation. I'm not at liberty to disclose such information, at the advice of my attorneys. That is something that angers some people to no end. Why is it that people think the Ramseys are not entitled to the same right to be represented by legal counsel as the rest of the citizens of the U.S.? And so, I suppose you might find that disappointing. I did not come here to answer questions that might damage this family. I DID come here to talk about JonBenet and the family, in general. I did not come here to argue or fight with some of the people who encounter me. I did not come here to prove that I am any particular person. On the contrary, once I assume someone is close to my identity, I will launch a diversionary tactic that will dismiss any such assumption. Why, you may ask? I will not compromise the privacy of this family nor have my words twisted by some person in the media. With you only, I would like to share certain things. I might sometimes sound like a New York lawyer; posting disclaimers that protect my identity, but I would enjoy just sharing a few things about myself and this family. I can see that I have made a few slips and typographical errors in my correspondences with you. I'll try to be more careful in the future. I hope to hear from you someday soon. Take care and thank you for your loyalty so far. A Friend